6 min read

Help write UK Online Safety & Phone Legislation for Children

Table of Contents

Workshop Info

Want to weigh in on pressing questions like:

  • 📱 Should young people have smartphones?
  • 🚫 Is an outright ban achievable?
  • 🛟 What can we do to make the internet safer for our young people?

💬 If you think you have any answers or thoughts, come to the Lounge (space permitting) and discuss them with a volunteer from the NSPCC Online Safety Advisory Group!

The drop in is going to be informal, and a safe space to discuss what you think should be done.

About me: Hi! I’m Leo, and I’m on the NSPCC Online Safety Youth Advisory Group, and we’re working at the moment to help create advice and materials for government & industry on how to make sure the web is safe for kids!


Summary of conversation

  • What are the positives of children having smartphones?
    • Safety and Communication: Essential for emergencies, sharing locations, and contacting friends/family.
    • ”Essential for contacting friends/family and sharing locations.”
    • Independence and Knowledge: Access to a wealth of information and entertainment.
    • ”Provides access to all the knowledge one could ever want.”
    • Social Acceptance: Helps fit in with peers and avoid bullying.
    • ”Prevents bullying and social isolation by fitting in with peers.”
  • What are the negatives of children having smartphones?
    • Addiction and Health: Risk of addiction and reduced spatial awareness.
    • ”Addicted to phones, lose your spatial awareness.”
    • Vulnerability: Potential for theft and exposure to harmful information.
    • ”Get robbed, risk of exposure to misleading or harmful information.”
    • Mental Skills: Dependence on instant searches can hinder memory and attention span.
    • ”Reliance on instant search and find on the web makes them rely on a computer for all their needs.”
  • If you were a child, would you want a smartphone?
    • Mixed Opinions: Some would find it useful, others believe in traditional development.
    • ”Probably. Absolutely."
    • "No. We grew up without them and our brain development was much better.”
  • If a child was in danger, would having a smartphone make them safer?
    • Divided Views: Some see benefits if used responsibly, others see no added advantage over basic phones.
    • ”It could if the child has been taught to use the device responsibly."
    • "No, there is literally no circumstance I can think of where a smartphone would be more helpful.”
  • Do you think smartphones are addictive?
    • General Agreement: Most agree smartphones can be addictive, particularly for certain personality types.
    • ”Yes!! Help you with situations – installing apps that make it more addictive."
    • "They’re just as addictive as books or food or fast cars.”
  • Should we limit children’s usage rather than ban?
    • Feasibility Issues: Many see limits as difficult to enforce, suggesting a focus on parental control and education.
    • ”Hard to police – don’t think it’s possible."
    • "Parents should also teach kids about it.”
    • What might some of the risks be of banning smartphones for young people?
    • Social Division and Safety: Could create social hierarchy and limit emergency communication.
    • ”Creates social division, increases anxiety."
    • "Need to call 999, limits freedom.”
  • Could more protections be embedded on smartphones to make them safer for young people? What could these be?
    • Technological and Educational Solutions: AI-powered age verification and content analysis, combined with education.
    • ”AI-powered age verification might be effective."
    • "Most things in life are made safer through education and human support.”
  • How can we better support young people to access the benefits of the online world?
    • Educational Tools: Positive promotion of safe content and dedicated educational devices.
    • ”Digital kite marks, digital ‘scores on the doors’ might help."
    • "Dedicated digital device that isn’t capable of connecting to the wider internet.”
  • How would a ban on smartphones be operationalised/enforced?
    • Enforcement Challenges: Likely ineffective, with suggestions for software regulation over outright bans.
    • ”Would have to fine parents. Gov would have to issue brick phones."
    • "Perhaps any ‘ban’ should be enforced by the software of popular platforms.”
  • What would be the impact on young people’s mental health?
    • Uncertain Effects: Potential for both positive and negative outcomes.
    • ”Too many variables. For a lot of kids, it would mean not being able to reach out to online support.”
  • What would be the impact on educational opportunities?
    • Significant Impact: Particularly on those without alternative access to technology.
    • ”The impact would be enormous. It’s probably not realistic any more."
    • "Those with the financial means would move onto laptops and PCs, those without would be left behind.”
  • Impact on their relationships with friends?
    • Mixed Impact: Some see strengthening of friendships, others predict increased isolation.
    • ”For many, it would mean even more isolation and loneliness."
    • "It would strengthen them. Nurseries foster some of the best child friendships at the moment as they don’t have any smartphones.”
  • How would a ban on smartphones impact your daily life?
    • Age-Dependent Impact: Greater impact on older children and those who rely on smartphones for safety.
    • ”12 yr old not much, 17 yr old massively."
    • "I let my son range around the city because he has a smartphone – I know I can see where he is.”

  • Other comments:
    • Surveillance Concerns: Potential negative consequences of increased surveillance justified by child safety.
    • ”UK tends to exploit ‘child safety’ to introduce more surveillance measures."
    • "Society needs more human engagement, care, and genuine interest in a child’s healthy development.”

Want to still weigh in? Post on Mastodon/Twitter with the #EMFOnlineSafety, and tag me in!